Question Where is free energy? Magnetic motors, hydrogen motors, perpetual motion generators?
Why is it not on the shelves or in ebay catalogs?

Best Answer This kind of stuff is still not mass marketed mainly because of skepticism around the world, I have personally found magnetic energy generators to be the best option for alternative energy. They require no light, no wind or grid electric to even start, and once they are working they don't stop for years to come. Many people are unaware that you can easily build your own magnetic energy generator from common easy to find parts. It's a shame more people don't build magnetic energy generators as a device like this could rid us all of the current energy crisis. Check the source below for more information.

Question Alternate energy = lost jobs?
Here is what I was thinking. It's possible that companies like Exxon Mobile would receive less profit by the spread of alternate energy therefore causing the loss of 30% of the workforce. So if they employ about 150, 000 workers, that's 45, 000 lost jobs. However, if products became cheaper over all, that would boost production of items and also make it cheaper to buy a house, higher manual labor to build houses, make it cheaper to start businesses for those interested and probably just everything is cheaper. Perhaps with the increase of item production, more people in those factories and so forth are required? And carpentry increase because people would be starting more business or making new constructions since those things would be cheaper? Also, an increase in skills and expertise for making components of these magnetic motors? Increase in jobs to keep maintenance around magnetic motors in-case something goes wrong? Not only that, the electricity bill would be practically nothing. So, if you own a house, you don't have to pay these bills. Just perhaps water. Water bill may be very cheap as they don't use gas to pump. I was looking at the magnetic motor for perpetual motion that doesn't require a fuel of any sort, just magnets. Perhaps it would cause job loss but also create other possibilities. With the lack of dependency on oil, we won't have to worry about the north pole or the south pole melting and drowning half the world. We won't have to worry about things like cap and trade, taxing our carbon emissions. Also, Our mobility would increase, imagine paying only 50 dollars a flight from here to somewhere across the world. Perhaps a little more. The mobile industry would see an increase in terms of flight. If flight is cheap, they'd probably be building a lot more aircrafts because it is so cheap to fly, a lot of people would be flying. Thus an increase in the aircraft building and safety job market? The technological job market would probably increase 10 fold. Basically, the types of jobs I am seeing would increase so far are the technology jobs and the carpentry. What do you think? frog Is it nut-baggish to want alternative sources of energy? If anything, you are nut-baggish for wanting to drill Alaska... Alaska is where all a lot of the ice is... therefore, you'd be creating a lot of ozone gases that would destroy the atmosphere directly above the ice country.... Melting it faster... Plus possible oil spills up from alaska when they use ships to ship the barrels. Alaska has a lot of resources in fish. You will jack up Alaska. How much is huge amounts of money and resources? Replacing a gas powered engine or turbine for I'd say 5 electric facilities with a magnetic one would cost less than the supplies needed to higher and drill Alaska. Plus it would cause less impact damage on the environment. Who knows how many fishes and world food supplies would be poisoned due to the drilling. Also, we wouldn't risk melting the ice. I'm pretty sure I saw a presidential candidate named Boehner state that he wanted to drill Alaska so it is curious what you say. Resour

Best Answer The only true solution, as I see it, is to drill in Alaska and cease our dependence on Middle East oil. This Green phenomenon has become a religious cult. I'm sorry to say that, because I have Green friends -- but the Green movement followers are simply a nut-bag religious cult. And one thing that the Green Leftists forget, is that to convert from conventional sources of energy to the newer sources of energy (such as solar and wind) is going to take a HUGE, HUGE amount of money and resources. We don't quite know what we've gotten ourselves into. The Green Leftists are sold on the idea that we can do everything RIGHT NOW, and they don't take into account the resources and money necessary for their conversions.

Question Perpetual motion machine?
First of all, I know that friction resistance makes the following apparatus not perpetual motion. But I need to make it as close as possible to perpetual for a physics project. So here's what I have: A 6" cart has a hole in the middle of it lengthwise. There is a coil of copper wire going around that hole. The cart is suspended by magnets on a circular track that has been heavily magnetized. Also inside the cart is a small electric toy motor and a wheel that protrudes from the side of the cart. Inside of the larger magnetized track is a small, non-magnetized track that the wheel can use to propel the cart around the track. If I give the cart an initial push, would I get enough voltage and power from magnetic induction to run the electric motor? The motor is made to be run with a AA battery with 1.5 volts. Would this work, and how can I optimize this so I could get it to run by itself for as long as possible?

Best Answer I see what you are trying to do, and as an experiment, it could be instructive. But ...well, while I do not want to be a kill-joy, there is a problem with the design. No matter how perfect the design, you will always lose a little efficiency in the generation of the electricity: you will get friction, eddy currents, heat and so forth. And so, not even considering the loss of energy in the driving motor, or the loss to air resistance or friction, you will always lose energy in the process of converting kinetic energy to electrical energy. You are using kinetic energy to power the generator, and that energy is coming from the momentum of the car. That means that the generator itself will reduce the momentum / speed of the car. And it will not produce enough energy to 'replace' that momentum. The reality is that your most efficient design would be to omit the generator - motor concept entirely. Supporting the car on a magnetic field, however, can be a very effective way of minimizing friction.